Yes, Ana de Armas fans really sued Universal
Never say you’ve seen it all because one thing that’s usually easy to rely on is that movie buffs end up surprising people around them by falling into new lows or doing something really stupid that can’t be tolerated Live sitting down to read a hilarious article like this and their jaws are wide open.In this case, the case dates back to 2019, when two fans rented movie yesterday, in which Ana de Armas appears in the trailer. Unfortunately, for some reason she wasn’t included in the film, much to the chagrin and anger of two fans who thought it was worth their time to sue Universal, claiming the studio was deceptive in their practices . Both fans may not realize that “Yesterday” isn’t the only film to cut actors from the film entirely, and surprisingly, fans don’t feel compelled to feel offended on behalf of many others, as That’s what they claimed, and didn’t bother to sue, hoping it had little chance of winning.
Here’s a trick a lot of people don’t seem to realize when they watch movies: fans can’t control them. This may seem inaccurate, as fans have complained and complained about it in recent years that seem to have changed the course of one movie or another.But the general idea is that the studio exists to give fans something fun to watch, not to ease their subtle feelings with big payouts when they feel cheated. If that was the case, Hollywood would have been bankrupt long ago. The idea that fans think studios owe them a bad movie experience is really funny, because it shows that anytime fans are upset they’re going to express their displeasure by suing the person who put them in a bad mood.
At the moment, Arma reps don’t seem to have any support for or against it, which is all the more heartening because they either don’t care or don’t want to admit it at all. Fans are funny in a way when they think their needs are so important because they tend to think people don’t put them in a blast on social media or anywhere else because of that attitude. It’s easy to think that some people won’t, because they probably feel the same way, but honestly, it’s too easy to laugh at anyone who thinks any studio owes them anything other than the entertainment movies they’re going to pay for. The film, yesterday, is about a world where people mysteriously forget the Beatles, and a young man who still remembers them, also a musician, decides to make their songs his own, at least until his Consciously he stopped doing it, at which point he revealed to the world what he did.
But it sounds like Ana is another part of the movie that ties things together a bit more, and her part was completely cut out when she appeared in the trailer. Sad for the fans who paid $3.99 for a Redbox movie and didn’t get what they wanted, only a $5 million lawsuit seemed to stabilize their delicate emotional state. Don’t be sad if you don’t laugh, I’ll laugh for both of us. It’s a dry laugh for sure but still amused at the guts of some fans because this lawsuit takes a lot of courage but no common sense because it’s essentially saying fans are suing because their feelings have been hurt , under the guise of a lawsuit over fraud committed by Universal Studios. Does anyone want to know how low fans are willing to go to get what they want and feel? offend on behalf of others? At this point, the best rebuttal is for another Ana de Armas fan to come forward and say they don’t feel offended at all. That would surely be a laughable thing.
At the end of the day, we pay for the movies we want to see. We have reasons to watch these movies, and if those reasons changed, most people would shrug and either wonder or see why things changed. But suing the studio for “deceptiveness” is a good joke, because it’s one of the naive reactions to the Internet lately, and it says something.
Thanks for visiting we hope our article Yes, Ana de Armas fans really sued Universal
, help us and share the article on Facebook, pinterest and whatsapp with the hashtags ☑️ #Ana #Armas #fans #sued #Universal ☑️!